Here, you'll find a variety of law reviews on the topic at hand, and it's easy to see, that the controversy in grandparent visitation rights did not, and will not, end since the decision made in Troxel v. Granville. We still have some sorting to do here, however, it takes time and we want to at least give you access to what we already have. Please feel free to contact us with any suggestions, and additionally, leave comments on any of the reviews on this page, and we'll add them below.
Authors explain the effects of Troxel v. Granville on various states in an easy to understand description. Their conclusion suggests that legislators find a line between best interests and proving a parent un-fit.
Author is an
Author is an
Author is a professor of Law, Howard University. In this law review, he challenged the constitutionality of grandparent visitation statutes among states that do not apply the harm standard.
Author: JD, University of Michigan Law School BBA, University of Michigan has written extensively on child welfare law issues and assessing student learning in legal education. In this law review, he wisely calls for the public discussion and debate to begin. The participants in this public discussion would be well served by a deep and probing consideration of the family's political functions within a large pluralistic democracy.
Author is based out of New York State. In theses law reviews, his research does not strictly mention the "Harm" standard in grandparent visitation statutes, however, he does disapprove of "Best Interests" as an only means of protecting parents and their children from state intervention, clearly point in that direction
Author is an attorney in Westfield admitted in New York State in 2009, registered with the Office of Court Administration (OCA) of New York State Unified Court System. Both Reviews are written specifically on New York State's statute and in favor of the harm standard.
is an attorney in Westfield admitted in New York State in 2009, registered with the Office of Court Administration (OCA) of New York State Unified Court System. This review is in favor of the harm standard.
Author approves of the harm standard
Author is
Author is
Author is
Author is
Author is
Author: 1991, Oklahoma; 1991, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma; 1992, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma and U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. this review is in favor of the harm standard.
Author is AGAINST THE HARM STANDARD
Add a footnote if this applies to your business
Copyright © 2024 Troxel v Granville - all rights reserved
Every decision you make, changes something
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.